Our Conscience or the Rule of Right
and Wrong
We are
covering some of the high points in the book, “Mere Christianity”, written by
C. S. Lewis, which has continued to be a best seller for over sixty years in
the Christian community. Professor
Lewis starts his book, “Mere Christianity” by talking about the idea of the
“Law of Right and Wrong” that we humans seem to know - or the human conscience.
The two
points he wants to make are (1) Human beings, all over the earth, have this
curious idea that they ought to behave in a certain way. and (2) Humans do not in fact behave in that
way. Humans have a conscience and they know
the Law of Right and Wrong: but they break it.
Where did this Law come from? And why is it important?
Professor
Lewis states that our ideas of right and wrong, or our God given conscience, is
not mere fancy, for most of us cannot easily get rid of it. However, Scripture
mentions that some people rebel against goodness and fairness and have “seared”
their consciences. (1 Timothy 4:2) This rule of right and wrong has been called
the “Laws of Nature” because people believed that the knowledge of right and
wrong just came naturally.
It seems
that there is something above and beyond the ordinary facts of human behavior
which none of us humans made but which we find pressing in on us! Scripture
speaks of a “conscience” that God gives to us humans. (Romans 1:19-21) Could
this be why most of us seem to have an idea of how we ought to behave? Professor Lewis thinks that this conscience that
humans have may be a clue that there is Someone behind the universe we live in.
Down through
the ages people have been wondering what our universe really is and how it came
to be. Professor Lewis states that there
are mainly two views on how our world came to be. These two main views have been held by people
down through the centuries.
First there is the materialist view. People who believe this view think that
matter and space just happen to exist, and always have existed, and always will
exist and no one knows why. And they believe that the matter, behaving in
certain fixed ways, just happened, perhaps by a big bang, or a mechanical dance
of atoms, or by some sort of a fluke, and this matter somehow produced
creatures like ourselves who are able to think and care and love!
By one
chance in a million the chemicals necessary for life, and the right
temperature, and many other intricate details just happened to occur on our
earth so that some of the matter on the earth came alive. And then, by a long series of chances, the
living creatures on this prehistoric earth over billions of years gradually developed
and evolved into things like us. Our
ancestors were amoebas and then evolved to pre-historic fish, and then evolved
legs and crawled up out of the water onto land and over billions more years these
walking fish evolved into apes that walked on all fours.
And then
over more billions of years our ape ancestors lost their fur and straightened
up and got smarter and evolved into the two-legged people that we are
today. Artists have drawn pictures of
fish walking up on land and apes gradually evolving into modern people.
Although we have never seen any of these half ape/people evolving today! We are
told that this materialist view is scientific and all thinking intelligent
people must believe this view!
And then the
second view, according to Professor Lewis is the religious view. People who believe this view are considered
backward. This view states that what is behind the universe is more like a Mind
or a Conscience. And the Mind has a purpose and prefers one thing to another. And this Mind or God created the universe,
partly for purposes we do not know. But
partly to produce creatures like himself.
Perhaps people who could love Him and He them.
C.S. Lewis
emphasized that down through the ages wherever there have been thinking
persons, both views – the materialist and the religious views – have been
around as explanations for how our universe came into existence. The materialist view did not show up in
modern times and it cannot be proven
scientifically.
Lewis
insists that one cannot find out which view is the right one by science.
Science works by experiments. Science
watches how things behave and records results.
Every scientific statement in the long run, however complicated it
looks, really is describing what it sees happening in a given time frame. This is the job of science.
The “theory
of evolution” or the theory that humans evolved over billions of years from
fish and then apes and finally humans – is just someone’s “theory” or idea of
what might have happened, not a scientific fact. No one has ever found the “missing link”
between apes and humans! So, none of the
materialist view is scientific, even though we are told that it is.
So, which of
these two ideas of how our world came about could possibly be true? Did our universe simply happen for no reason,
or is there a Mind or is God behind the universe with His creative work making
it what it is? If it was God, what clues
did He leave to show Himself to us? C.S.
Lewis believes that He might show Himself as an influence inside ourselves or a
command inside our souls trying to get us to behave in certain ways. And that is what we do find inside ourselves –
an idea of right and wrong! Lewis
believes that this ought to arouse our suspicions!
We find that
we do not exist on our own, that we are under a law: that Somebody or something
wants us to behave in a certain way. Our
conscience – that still small Voice, is the clue that Lewis thinks God left
behind. He suggests that in the Moral
Law Somebody or something from beyond the material universe is actually getting
at us!
So, without
taking anything from the Bible or Church doctrine, we are trying to see what we
can find out about this Somebody on our own. We have two bits of evidence about the
Somebody. One is the universe He made. The universe is a beautiful place, so He must
be a great artist. But the universe can also
be a dangerous and terrifying place.
And the other bit of evidence is the moral law
which humans, unless they rebel against it, have in their minds. There is nothing indulgent or soft about the
Moral Law. We have not gotten as far as
believing in a personal God yet. So, if
this Mind responsible for our earth is impersonal towards us, there may be no
sense in asking Him to let us off the hook when we don’t live up to the Rule of
Right and Wrong He seems to have given us.We can try harder, but it seems we
keep on missing the mark over and over again. It seems our case is hopeless. If God holds our sins against us, we are
lost. We are in a dilemma. God is the
only comfort, and He is also the supreme terror.
Christianity
tells people to repent and promises them forgiveness. It has nothing to say to people who do not believe
they have done anything to repent of and who do not feel they need
forgiveness. It is after we realize that
there is a real Moral Law and a Power behind that Law and that we have broken
that Law - it is after all this, that Christianity begins to talk. It tells us
how the demands of this Law, which we cannot meet, have been met on our behalf. And how God Himself becomes a man to save
humans from the disapproval of God.
In his book,
Lewis goes on to explain what Christians believe. And to ask people to face the facts and
understand the questions which Christianity claims to answer. And they are very terrifying facts!
No comments:
Post a Comment